用户名: 密码: 登 录   个人中心   系统维护   用户注册  联系我们
当前位置 >首页 > 标准信息

全文阅读 全文下载 章节阅读

基本信息

ARP5905
Calibration and Acceptance of Icing Wind Tunnels
Calibration and Acceptance of Icing Wind Tunnels
2009-12-01
有效
【范围】 This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) document provides recommended practices for the calibration and acceptance of icing wind tunnels to be used in testing of aircraft components and systems and for the development of simulated ice shapes. This document is not applicable to air-breathing propulsion test facilities configured for the purposes of engine icing tests. Use of facilities as part of an aircraft’s ice protection Certification Plan should be reviewed and accepted by the applicable regulatory agency prior to testing. Following acceptance of a test plan, data generated in these facilities may be submitted to regulatory agencies for use in the certification of aircraft ice protection systems and components. Certain types of tests may be appropriate in facilities with capabilities that are not as rigorously characterized as by the practices defined herein, and the acceptability of these tests should be coordinated with the applicable regulatory agency. 1.1 Background: The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration established an icing plan in 1997 to respond to a need for a comprehensive program to create an awareness of inflight icing issues and to establish documents to provide training and guidance for regulatory authorities, aircraft operators, research organizations, and aircraft manufacturers. The FAA published a 14-task plan, entitled the “FAA Inflight Aircraft Icing Plan,” and identified groups of people within the U.S. Government and throughout the aircraft industry to address the action items contained in this plan. Task 11 of this plan called for the development of “validation criteria and data for simulation methods used to determine ice shapes on aircraft.” It also indicated that this task was to include data on “wind tunnel[s], ice accretion computer codes, and icing tankers.” The FAA suggested “a coordinated effort among research organizations, industry, and regulatory authorities” and individuals were asked to participate in this work. Task 11 was divided into three subtasks and the people that participated in Subtask A were tasked with addressing criteria for the use of tankers, tunnels, and codes. Three documents were developed by the members of the Task 11.A Working Group and these three documents are being published as SAE ARPs. While each document follows a format that is appropriate to the topic, the three documents provide guidance for the application of codes (ARP5903), tankers (ARP5904), and tunnels (ARP5905) to the icing certification or qualification process. The reader is directed to the following: DOT/FAA/CT-88/8-2, “Aircraft Icing Handbook,” Volume 2, Chapter V, Section 4.0, Testing to Demonstrate Compliance, March 1991; “Aircraft Ice Protection,” U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Advisory Circular (AC) 20-73, April 21, 1971; “Certification of Transport Category Rotorcraft,” (AC 29-2C), September 30, 1999; and the advisory circulars for icing certification of airplanes (AC 23.1419-2A and AC 25.1419-1) for the myriad of considerations that are inherent in defining and conducting test programs for the purpose of obtaining certification for flight into known icing conditions. This ARP provides recommended practices for the calibration of icing wind tunnels. It is not intended to substitute for the regulatory agency’s latitude in selecting the combination of tests or inspections required to demonstrate compliance with regulations as described in the Aircraft Icing Handbook. 1.3 Facility/Site Qualification: An icing facility that conforms to the recommended practices in this document provides an artificial icing test volume consistent with the capability provided by current wind tunnel technology. If results produced in a test facility are to be used in the certification process of aircraft components or ice protection systems, it should be substantiated that the facility calibration and supporting resources conform to this ARP. Also, a comparison between the facility icing condition envelopes that can be simulated and those defined by the regulatory authorities should be presented.strRefField
【与前一版的变化】

引用文件/被引文件

Aircraft Inflight Icing Terminology
Ice Shape Measurement and Comparison Techniques Workshop
Airborne Icing Tankers
Calibration and Acceptance of Icing Wind Tunnels
Summary of Icing Simulation Test Facilities
Droplet Sizing Instrumentation Used in Icing Facilities
Documents with numbers such as DOT/FAA/AR-00/37 or DOT/FAA/CT- 88/8-3 are available through the National Technical Information Service (NTIS)
Superintendent of Documents
U.S. Department of Transportation
Droplet Impingement and Ice Accretion Computer Codes
Calibration and Acceptance of Icing Wind Tunnels

包含图表

formula 2
Example of Typical C
Example of a Refrige
Test Section Perform
Examle of Total Temp
Example of Total Pre
Example of Static Pr
Example of Pressure/
Example of Hot Wire
formula 9
formula 10
Example of Icing Clo
Minimum Test Matrix
Example of Centerlin
formula 11
formula 12
formula 13
formula 14
formula 15
formula 16
formula 17
Example of Icing Clo
Facility Droplet Siz
Example of Icing Cal
formula 18
Icing Blade Collecti
formula 19
formula 20
formula 21
formula 22
formula 23
formula 24
formula 25
formula 26
formula 27
formula 28
Cylinder Collection
formula 29
Ludlam Limit LWC (g/
formula 30
formula 31
formula 32
formula 33
formula 34
formula 35
formula 36
formula 37
formula 38
formula 39
formula 40
formula 41
formula 42
formula 43
formula 44
formula 45
formula 46
formula 47
formula 48
formula 49
formula 50
formula 51
formula 52
formula 53
formula 54
formula 55
formula 56
formula 57
formula 58
formula 59
formula 60
formula 61
formula 62
formula 63
formula 64
formula 65
Cone Probe
formula 66
formula 67
formula 68
formula 69
formula 70
formula 71
formula 72
Test Points to Deter
KAVersus Air Pressur
Test Points To Deter
KVVersus Airspeed Pl
formula 73
formula 74
formula 75
Test Points To Inves
Comparison of Measur
formula 76
Flow Coefficient Tes
Flow Coefficient Tes
Example of Nozzle Re

标准反馈


  • 问题类型:
    反    馈: